Justice Amy Coney Barrett, in a concurrence to Friday’s ruling striking down President Joe Biden’s student debt forgiveness plan, defended the Supreme Court conservative majority’s use of a controversial legal theory and — deploying analogies concerning babysitters and grocery store owners — laid out how she believed the doctrine should be used in the future.
CNN.com – RSS Channel Justice Amy Coney Barrett, in a concurrence to Friday’s ruling striking down President Joe Biden’s student debt forgiveness plan, defended the Supreme Court conservative majority’s use of a controversial legal theory and — deploying analogies concerning babysitters and grocery store owners — laid out how she believed the doctrine should be used in the future.
Read More Justice Amy Coney Barrett, in a concurrence to Friday’s ruling striking down President Joe Biden’s student debt forgiveness plan, defended the Supreme Court conservative majority’s use of a controversial legal theory and — deploying analogies concerning babysitters and grocery store owners — laid out how she believed the doctrine should be used in the future.